Hugh W. Nibley disputes the resemblance claimed between View of the Hebrews and the Book of Mormon.

Date
Mar 1954
Type
Periodical
Source
Hugh W. Nibley
LDS
Hearsay
Direct
Secondary
Reference

Hugh Nibley, "New Approaches to Book of Mormon Study. Part 5," Improvement Era 57, no. 3 (March 1954): 170

Scribe/Publisher
Improvement Era
People
Hugh W. Nibley, Ethan Smith
Audience
Reading Public
Transcription

The Book of Mormon like the Bible is an organic whole. We are asking the literary experts to produce just one modern work which resembles it as such. There are, we believe, plenty of ancient parallels, but if the Book of Mormon is a fraud, a cheat, a copy, a theft, etc., as people have said it is, we have every right to ask for a sampling of the abundant and obvious sources from which it was taken. Smith's View of the Indians is no more like the Book of Mormon than a telephone directory. All attempts to find contemporary works which the Book of Mormon even remotely resembles have been conspicuous failures. So it has been necessary to explain the book as a work of pure and absolute fiction, a non-religious, money-making romance. But one need only read a page of the book at random to see that it is a religious book through and through, and one need only read the title page of the first edition to see that it is given to the world Is holy scripture, no less. Here we come to the crux of the whole matter.

Copyright © B. H. Roberts Foundation
The B. H. Roberts Foundation is not owned by, operated by, or affiliated with the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.