William Law recalls seeing a shorter version of the plural marriage revelation.

Date
Mar 30, 1887
Type
Interview
Source
William Law
Excommunicated
Critic
Hearsay
Scribed Verbatim
Late
Reference

William Law, Interview, March 30, 1887, in Thomas Gregg, The Prophet of Palmyra (New York: John B. Alden, 1890), 504–505, 514–515

Scribe/Publisher
John B. Alden
People
Hyrum Smith, William Law, Joseph Smith, Jr.
Audience
Reading Public
Transcription

Interview with William Law, March 30, 1887.

Dr. William Law lives with his son, Judge “Tommy” Law. The house is a fine cottage, large, well-kept grounds surround it. We entered a cheerful looking room and there sat William Law, dressed in black, a most venerable looking figure. The head has a striking expression of intelligence, the large, clear eyes are of a remarkably deep steel blue; the general impression is that of a thinker, of a benevolent and just man. He greeted me in a fatherly way. I expressed my joy at seeing at last so important a witness of a history to whose study I had devoted two years.

. . .

“What do you know about the revelation on polygamy?”

“ The way I heard of it was that Hyrum gave it to me to read. I was never in a High Council where it was read, all stories to the contrary notwithstanding. Hy¬ rum gave it to me in his office, told me to take it home and read it, and then be careful with it, and bring it back again. I took it home, read it and showed it to my wife. She and I were just turned upside down by it ; we did not know what to do. I said to my wife, that I would take it over to Joseph and ask him about it. I did not believe that he would acknowledge it, and I said so to my wife. But she was not of my opinion. She felt perfectly sure that he would father it. When I came to Joseph and showed him the paper, he said ‘Yes, that is a genuine revelation.’ I said to the prophet: ‘But in the Book of Doctrine and Covenants there is a revelation just the contrary of this. 'Oh,’ said Joseph, 'that was given when the church was in its infancy, then it was all right to feed the people on milk, but now it is necessary to give them strong meat.' We talked a long time about it; finally our discussion became very hot, and we gave it up. From that time on the breach between us became more open and more decided every day, after having been prepared for a long time. But the revelation gave the finishing touch to my doubts, and showed me clearly that he was a rascal. I took the revelation back to my wife and told her that Joseph had acknowledged it. ‘That is what I fully expected,’ said she. 'What shall we do?’ said I. She advised me to keep still, try to sell my property quietly for what I could get. But I did not follow her advice. My heart was burning, I wanted to tread upon the viper.”

"You returned the revelation to Hyrum?”

“Yes, I did. I was astonished to see in your book that the revelation was such a long document. I remember DISTINCTLY that the original given me by Hyrum was much shorter. It covered not more than two or three pages of foolscap. The contents are substantially the same, but there was not that theological introduction. The thing consisted simply in the command of doing it, and that command was restricted to the High Priesthood and to virgins and widows. But as to Joseph, himself, the Lord’s chosen servant, it was restricted to virgins only, to clean vessels, from which to procure a pure seed to the Lord.”

Copyright © B. H. Roberts Foundation
The B. H. Roberts Foundation is not owned by, operated by, or affiliated with the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.