Brant A. Gardner discusses the use of "Jew" in the Book of Mormon; argues it is an example of a translator's anachronism.

Date
2007
Type
Book
Source
Brant A. Gardner
LDS
Hearsay
Direct
Reference

Brant A. Gardner, Second Witness: Analytical and Contextual Commentary on the Book of Mormon, 6 vols. (Salt Lake City: Greg Kofford Books, 2007), 6:90

Scribe/Publisher
Greg Kofford Books
People
Brant A. Gardner
Audience
Reading Public
Transcription

The Book of Mormon maintains a distinction between the remnant of the house of Jacob and the Jews, even though they are both descendants of the house of Israel, which became Jacob’s new name (Gen. 32:28). The house of Jacob is the New World branch, and the word “Jews” is reserved for the Old World branch. The use of that particular word is actually anachronistic for the Book of Mormon as a document that left the Old World around 600 B.C. Originally meaning only someone form Judah, the term “Jew” doesn’t become recontextualized until after the return of the exiled Israelites from Babylon. This places the development of that use for the term after Lehi and his family left the Old World.

Since our Book of Mormon is a translation, the choice of the word “Jew” was probably Joseph Smith’s and represented his best understanding of a term that would distinguish between the Old and New World branches of the house of Israel.

Citations in Mormonr Qnas
Copyright © B. H. Roberts Foundation
The B. H. Roberts Foundation is not owned by, operated by, or affiliated with the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.