Julie M. Smith discusses the Christology of Jesus; argues it has a "full" Christology and that "A close reading of Mark disputes the idea of a historical development from low to high Christology."

Date
2018
Type
Book
Source
Julie M. Smith
LDS
Hearsay
Direct
Reference

Julie M. Smith, The Gospel According to Mark (BYU New Testament Commentary Series; Provo, UT: BYU Studies, 2018), 885-900

Scribe/Publisher
BYU Studies
People
Julie M. Smith
Audience
Reading Public
PDF
Transcription

Appendix G:

Mark's Christology

“Christology” is the term used to describe an author’s depiction of Jesus Christ’s nature. A Christology is considered low if it focuses on Jesus’ human aspects or high if it stresses his divine attributes. Traditionally, Mark’s Gospel has been thought to have the lowest Christology—and John’s the highest—of the Gospels, with Matthew’s and Luke’s in between. Yet Mark exhibits elements of high Christology as well, stemming from how Jesus’ story echoes HB texts. Clearly, Mark contains elements of a low Christology but also contains elements of a very high Christology, so that if Mark’s portrait of Jesus must be reduced to one word, the best choice is neither “low” nor “high” but rather “full.”

. . .

A close reading of Mark disputes the idea of a historical development from low to high Christology. While there was historical development in understandings of Christology, the track was not from low to high but rather from full to high. €e lower elements of Markan Christology are usually elided by Matthew and Luke, and John’s tradition is almost entirely lacking in these lower elements. €e trajectory of the historical development of the canonized Gospels at least shows a diminished portrait of Jesus, changed from being painted with Mark’s full palette to John’s far more restricted one.

Citations in Mormonr Qnas
Copyright © B. H. Roberts Foundation
The B. H. Roberts Foundation is not owned by, operated by, or affiliated with the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.