Daniel N. Gullotta reviews and refutes Richard Carrier's arguments for Jesus mythicism.

Date
2017
Type
Periodical
Source
Daniel N. Gullotta
Non-LDS
Hearsay
Secondary
Reference

Daniel N. Gullotta, "On Richard Carrier’s Doubts: A Response to Richard Carrier’s On the Historicity of Jesus: Why We Might Have Reason for Doubt," Journal for the Historicity of Jesus, 2017

Scribe/Publisher
Brill, Journal of the Historicity of Jesus
People
Daniel N. Gullotta
Audience
Reading Public
PDF
Transcription

Abstract

The Jesus Myth theory is the view that the person known as Jesus of Nazareth had no historical existence. Throughout the centuries this view has had a few but notable adherents such as Bruno Bauer, Arthur Drews, G.A. Wells, and Robert M. Price. Recently, Richard Carrier’s work On the Historicity of Jesus (Sheffield Phoenix Press, 2014) has attempted to reexamine the question in a rigorous academic fashion. According to Carrier, within the earliest days of Christianity, Jesus was not understood as a historic human figure, but rather as a celestial-angelic being, akin to Gabriel in Islam or to Moroni in Mormonism, and only came to be understood as a historical person later. While Carrier’s hypothesis is problematic and unpersuasive, there are several key points related to his work that this article specifically challenges and critiques.

Citations in Mormonr Qnas
Copyright © B. H. Roberts Foundation
The B. H. Roberts Foundation is not owned by, operated by, or affiliated with the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.